Here is a video that discusses potential options a DRE licensed real estate broker or salesperson faces following being served an accusation.
DRE licensing discipline and potential options following an accusation
California Senate Bill 706 requires real estate licensees to report disciplinary actions of other agencies and crimes to the DRE or face $5,000 fine and license discipline
The State of California is looking to clean up the real estate profession and new rights to impose large fines against real estate licensees are now on the books.
SB 706 creates new requirements California DRE brokers and salespersons should be aware of in 2012 and going forward. A new law, SB 706 sets forth some new rules for real estate licensees:
(1) SB 706 Requires the automatic suspension of any licensee who is incarcerated after conviction of a felony, regardless of whether the conviction has been appealed.
So, if you get a felony and are incarcerated your DRE real estate license will be suspended.
(2) SB 706 Requires the DRE or OREA to notify the licensee in writing of the suspension and of his or her right to elect to have the issue of penalty heard, as specified.
(3) Requires a California real estate licensee to submit a written report of any of the following to the DRE or OREA:
(a) The bringing of an indictment or information charging a felony against the licensee; (b) Arrest of the licensee;
(c) conviction of the licensee, including any felony or misdemeanor; and,
(d) any disciplinary action taken by another licensing entity or authority of this state or of another state.
Common California felonies include but are not limited to: Murder, involuntary manslaughter, mayhem, sodomy by force, any felony punishable by death or imprisonment for life, attempted murder, rape, robbery, assault with a deadly weapon, arson, burglary, kidnapping, bank robbery, grand theft, sexual abuse of child, etc.
Common California misdemeanors include but are not limited to: DUI / DWI, Domestic Violence, Trespass, Petty Theft / Shoplifting, Assault and Battery, Disorderly Conduct, Reckless Driving / Exhibition of Speed, Obscene Matter, Probation Violations, Receipt of Stolen Property, Unlicensed Driver, Illegal Gambling, Public Drunkenness, Solicitation of Prostitution, Violation of Restraining Orders,
This section is fairly self explanatory. The licensee should realize that under this law, it requires the report to be made in writing within 30 days; and that failure to make a report is a public offense punishable by a fine not to exceed $5,000 and shall constitute unprofessional conduct.
What else does SB 706 require?
SB 706 also requires a licensee to identify himself or herself as a licensee or registrant of the DRE or the OREA to law enforcement and the court upon an arrest or being charged with a crime and requires DRE and OREA to inform licensees of this requirement.
The new law also requires the clerk of the court to do the following:
A. Report to the DRE or OREA any judgment for a crime committed or for any judgment in excess of $30,000, for which a licensee is responsible due to negligence, error or omission in practice, or rendering unauthorized professional services.
B. Transmit any felony preliminary hearing transcript concerning a defendant licensee of the DRE or OREA.
C. SB 706 also requires the district attorney, city attorney, other prosecuting agency, or clerk of the court to notify the DRE or OREA if a licensee is charged with a felony immediately upon obtaining information that the defendant is a licensee of the DRE or OREA.
This bill thus gives the DRE greater disciplinary authority to protect the public. A licensed agent or broker will be required to report to the DRE within 30 days any disciplinary action taken by another licensing entity in California or another state, or by a federal governmental agency. An indictment or information charging a felony against the license holder or a conviction of a felony or misdemeanor, including a plea of guilty or no contest, must also be reported. Failure to report may be grounds for license discipline or a $5,000 penalty.
To get a California Real Estate Lawyer to keep you updated on new California laws, and to assist you in corporate compliance check out our newly launched BrokerCounsel.com California real estate licensee corporate counsel programs. Sometimes the best money you can spend is to keep you out of trouble in the first place!
California Department of Real Estate authorized to write $2,500 citations and fines courtesy of SB 53
If you are a California real estate broker you should be aware of a new law SB 53 passed in 2011 that authorizes the DRE to issue fines and citations up to $2,500 for brokers and salespersons who violate the California Real Estate Law and even for non licensed persons who are found to have engaged in unlicensed real estate activity.
The citations will not be recorded as discipline to the license. However, failure to pay the fine could lead to license discipline and non-renewal of the real estate license.
Licensees may appeal the findings of any such citation through an administrative hearing process conducted according to current law governing administrative hearings.
The fines will be funneled into the California Consumer Recovery Account which is used to pay out victims of real estate fraud committed by licensed agents.
If you do not have a corporate counsel on your team now helping you to comply with the plethora of state and federal laws and new case law that comes out each year, you could find yourself dealing with the DRE. This is a good time to mention our California Real Estate Broker Counsel program. Check it out and see how we have made it easy to afford your own corporate counsel to help you navigate these types of legal compliance issues in California and Arizona.
California Breach of Fiduciary Law and the Statute of Limitations 4 years says caselaw
CALIFORNIA BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY UPDATE
California real estate brokers often call us to discuss audits, investigations, and accusations they are facing with the California Department of Real Estate (“DRE”).
One of the issues that comes up in audits and investigations is the brokers duty to keep and maintain records of their real estate transactions. Typically, we give the boilerplate answer under the code (California Business and Professions Code Section 10148):
(a) A licensed real estate broker shall retain for three years copies of all listings, deposit receipts, canceled checks, trust records, and other documents executed by him or her or obtained by him or her in connection with any transactions for which a real estate broker license is required. The retention period shall run from the date of the closing of the transaction or from the date of the listing if the transaction is not consummated. After notice, the books, accounts, and records shall be made available for examination, inspection, and copying by the commissioner or his or her designated representative during regular business hours; and shall, upon the appearance of sufficient cause, be subject to audit without further notice, except that the audit shall not be harassing in nature.
So, taking this, general compliance with the DRE would require maintaining real estate records for three years. However, what about the situation where a California real estate company, or broker gets sued for a breach of fiduciary duty? What is the statute of limitations on a breach of fiduciary duty claim in California?
The answer according to a new California court of appeal case is 4 years. See Thompson v. Canyon, 198 Cal.App.4th 594. Here is what the court said in the case:
E. The cause of action for breach of fiduciary duty is timely under the applicable statute of limitations, Code of Civil Procedure section 343 (9) The Code of Civil Procedure does not specify a statute of limitations for breach of fiduciary duty. The cause of action is therefore governed by the residual four-year statute of limitations in Code of Civil Procedure section 343 governing “[a]n action for relief not hereinbefore provided for” in the code. (See Rylaarsdam, supra, ¶ 4:1791.).
Given the Thompson case, it may be wise for a California real estate professional to keep their real estate transaction files for a period of four or more years, in the event they become involved in a breach of fiduciary duty lawsuit, so that you are better able to defend yourself. This article is general legal information only and not legal advice. The case is subject to change. If you are facing a breach of fiduciary duty lawsuit, and need a California Real Estate lawyer to represent you consider hiring Attorney Steve Vondran. More information about general California Real Estate compliance can be found here. Mr. Vondran is licensed to practice law in CA and AZ.
Need help filling out California RE 515 form?
If you are convicted of a crime in California, this may have an impact on your California Real Estate license. Especially if your license was already in restricted status. If you are convicted of a crime (for example a DUI, assault, battery, shoplifting, forgery, fraud, marijuana possession etc.) there may come occasion that the DRE requests that you fill out RE form 515 and RE 515D (Conviction Detail Report). These forms ask you to disclose the nature of convictions and details involving the crime.
If you are dealing with these types of issues, you may want to consider having a California DRE Defense lawyer review your case and assist you in preparing these forms.
Attorney Steve discusses the California Realtor Duty to Arbitrate
Here is an article I just wrote that explains, in general terms, what you face in a real estate arbitration before the board in California.
Primer on California Administrative Procedures Act
When a California DRE licensed broker or salesperson faces an administrative hearing involving their license (ex. a hearing to determine whether the broker’s license should be revoked or suspended) the California Adiministrative Procudure Act applies.
For example, say a California Real Estate Broker was charge with committing one or more of the following acts:
- Comingling broker trust account funds (California business and professions code section 10176(e))
- Improper use of unlicensed DBA (California business and professions code section 10159.5)
- Failure to apply for branch office license (California business and professions code section 10163)
- Accepting Advance Fees for Loan Modifications (Violation of California SB 94)
- Collecting Advance fees without an approved advance fee agreement (Califonia B&P 10085)
- Failure of broker to properly supervise licensed activity (commissioner regulation 2725)
proceeding, not included in (a) or (b) above;
Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 1010) of Title 14 of Part 3, or, if he or she is a party, to
§ 1024. Subpoenas; Motion for a Protective Order
Attorney Steve Vondran discusses DRE accusations and SB 94 defense for California Real Estate Brokers
Here is another blog we just posted dealing with California SB 94, the MARS rule and Foreclosure Consultants.










